Argumentation in Science Education

Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research
eBook
(296 Seiten)
  Sofort lieferbar | Lieferzeit:3-5 Tage I

Unser bisheriger Preis:ORGPRICE: 206,95 EUR

Jetzt 178,49 EUR*

ISBN-13:
9781402066702
Einband:
eBook
Seiten:
296
Autor:
Sibel Erduran
Serie:
Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education
eBook Typ:
PDF
eBook Format:
eBook
Kopierschutz:
Adobe DRM [Hard-DRM]
Sprache:
Englisch
Beschreibung:

"This book brings together the work of leading experts in argumentation in science education. It presents research combining theoretical and empirical perspectives relevant for secondary science classrooms. Since the 1990s, argumentation studies have increased at a rapid pace, from stray papers to a wealth of research exploring ever more sophisticated issues.
Editors' ForewordPreface. A. Tiberghien

Section I Argumentation Foundations
Chapter 1. Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview. M Jimenez Aleixandre & S Erduran
Chapter 2. Cognitive Foundations of Learning Argumentation. M. Garcia-Mila & C. Andersen
Chapter 3. Methodological Foundations in the Study of Science Classroom Argumentation. S. Erduran
Chapter 4. What can Argumentation tell us about Epistemology? W. Sandoval & K. Millwood.

Section II Research on Teaching and Learning Argumentation
Chapter 5. Designing Argumentation Learning Environments. M. Jimenez Aleixandre
Chapter 6. Social Aspects of Argumentation. S. Kolst¿ & M. Ratcliffe
Chapter 7. Analysis of Lines of Reasoning in Written Argumentation. G. Kelly, J. Regev & W. Prothero.
Chapter 8. Quality of Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria. R Duschl

Section III Argumentation in Context
Chapter 9. Argumentation in Socio-scientific Contexts. L. Simonneaux
Chapter 10. The Role of Moral Reasoning in Argumentation: Conscience, Characterand Care. D. Zeidler & T. Sadler
Chapter 11. Role of Information Technology in Supporting Argumentation in theClassroom. D. Clark, M. Baker, A. Weinberger and M. Menekse
Chapter 12. Science Teacher Education and Professional Development inArgumentation. A. Zohar
Our conversations about arguments began in Nashville in the Spring of 1996 in Richard Duschl’s doctoral seminar that we were both attending, Marilar Jiménez-Aleixandre as a visiting scholar at Vanderbilt University. Jiménez-Aleixandre and Duschl were designing authentic problems in genetics for the University of Santiago de Compostela-based RODA project aimed at engaging high school students in argumentation. Erduran and Duschl had been working on Project SEPIA extending their work in Pittsburgh schools to the design of curricula that support epistemological aspects of scientific inquiry including argumentation. In that spring we attended a NARST s- sion in St Louis, where Gregory Kelly, Steven Druker and Catherine Chen presented a paper about argumentation. As a consequence, a symposium about argumentation was organised (possibly the first of its kind) at the 1997 NARST meeting in Chicago, including papers from Kelly and colleagues and from Jiménez-Aleixandre, Bugallo and Duschl. The symposium was attended, among others, by Rosalind Driver, who had just submitted an application for funding of an argumentation project based at King’s College London, a project Erduran would incidentally work on after Driver’s untimely death. From this time frame in the 1990s to the present day, argumentation studies in science education have increased at a rapid pace, from stray papers for which we were unable to find an appropriate strand in a conference, to a wealth of research base exploring ever more sophisticated issues.

Kunden Rezensionen

Zu diesem Artikel ist noch keine Rezension vorhanden.
Helfen sie anderen Besuchern und verfassen Sie selbst eine Rezension.